Skip to Main Content
Odo (
constable_odo
) wrote
2013
-
04
-
20
07:01 pm
(no subject)
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
commanderspock
2013-04-30 04:37 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Well, I admit I did not think that through properly. I really do not know if this is the right course of action at all. Given the alternatives it might be the best one available.
no subject
(Anonymous)
2013-04-30 04:42 am (UTC)
(
link
)
tbh it probs is the best idea at the moment i'm just annoyed that you and pavel apparently wanted to do it in the most likely to go awry way possible
i mean rly
no subject
commanderspock
2013-04-30 04:48 am (UTC)
(
link
)
No, I do understand that and see your point. I'm certainly not arguing with the Doctor's inclusion.
Edited
2013-04-30 04:49 (UTC)
no subject
(Anonymous)
2013-04-30 04:50 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I... suppose that is not overly objectionable.
looks like u thought about it tho
not /overly/ objectionable
so only a little or
no subject
commanderspock
2013-04-30 04:56 am (UTC)
(
link
)
The proxy is an unknown quantity. The inclusion or exclusion of others is not something I can forsee the outcome of.
Edited
2013-04-30 04:57 (UTC)
no subject
(Anonymous)
2013-04-30 05:02 am (UTC)
(
link
)
uh-huh. but you can ~foresee~ the outcome of you chatting it up with the proxy
hmm
no subject
commanderspock
2013-04-30 05:06 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I guessed. I guessed from what I've seen in the Tall Man's mind. It is really all I have to go on.
no subject
(Anonymous)
2013-04-30 05:08 am (UTC)
(
link
)
o ok
1952 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-30 04:42 am (UTC)(link)i mean rly
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-30 04:50 am (UTC)(link)looks like u thought about it tho
not /overly/ objectionable
so only a little or
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-30 05:02 am (UTC)(link)hmm
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-30 05:08 am (UTC)(link)