commanderspock: (well then)

[personal profile] commanderspock 2013-04-30 04:37 am (UTC)(link)
Well, I admit I did not think that through properly. I really do not know if this is the right course of action at all. Given the alternatives it might be the best one available.

(Anonymous) 2013-04-30 04:42 am (UTC)(link)
tbh it probs is the best idea at the moment i'm just annoyed that you and pavel apparently wanted to do it in the most likely to go awry way possible

i mean rly
commanderspock: (oh really)

[personal profile] commanderspock 2013-04-30 04:48 am (UTC)(link)
No, I do understand that and see your point. I'm certainly not arguing with the Doctor's inclusion.
Edited 2013-04-30 04:49 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2013-04-30 04:50 am (UTC)(link)
I... suppose that is not overly objectionable.

looks like u thought about it tho

not /overly/ objectionable

so only a little or
commanderspock: (on the bridge)

[personal profile] commanderspock 2013-04-30 04:56 am (UTC)(link)
The proxy is an unknown quantity. The inclusion or exclusion of others is not something I can forsee the outcome of.
Edited 2013-04-30 04:57 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2013-04-30 05:02 am (UTC)(link)
uh-huh. but you can ~foresee~ the outcome of you chatting it up with the proxy

hmm
commanderspock: (really jim)

[personal profile] commanderspock 2013-04-30 05:06 am (UTC)(link)
I guessed. I guessed from what I've seen in the Tall Man's mind. It is really all I have to go on.

(Anonymous) 2013-04-30 05:08 am (UTC)(link)
o ok