Odo (
constable_odo
) wrote
2013
-
04
-
20
07:01 pm
(no subject)
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
keevan
2013-05-03 12:17 am (UTC)
(
link
)
yes, only me. of course... how many of you have been spoken to so kindly by a founder?
no subject
(Anonymous)
2013-05-03 12:39 am (UTC)
(
link
)
That is no excuse for your treasonous choices.
no subject
waltersullivan
2013-05-03 12:39 am (UTC)
(
link
)
wow you mad huh
no subject
keevan
2013-05-03 12:41 am (UTC)
(
link
)
of course they are. i have something they can only wish for.
no subject
waltersullivan
2013-05-03 01:05 am (UTC)
(
link
)
jealousy's a bad look for them. and you know, for a group that's supposed to be so sneaky, they're being awfully transparent with this shit.
no subject
keevan
2013-05-03 01:14 am (UTC)
(
link
)
i quite agree. it really is... tiresome.
no subject
waltersullivan
2013-05-03 01:17 am (UTC)
(
link
)
i'm not all that impressed with them right now. maybe my expectations of the many were just too high for them to live up to.
no subject
keevan
2013-05-03 01:21 am (UTC)
(
link
)
perhaps. i have often been... less than enthralled.
no subject
(Anonymous)
2013-05-03 01:22 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Ha! I always knew you were defective, Keevan. But to admit to it so freely?
no subject
waltersullivan
2013-05-03 01:25 am (UTC)
(
link
)
aw, defective. look at it, it's like baby's first insult.
no subject
keevan
2013-05-03 01:27 am (UTC)
(
link
)
it is a rather grave insult actually, among my people
no subject
waltersullivan
2013-05-03 01:28 am (UTC)
(
link
)
because of the cloning thing, right? didn't come out to factory standards or some shit.
no subject
keevan
2013-05-03 01:34 am (UTC)
(
link
)
essentially
no subject
keevan
2013-05-03 01:26 am (UTC)
(
link
)
ahhh yes. i believe the phrase is... tut up? is that what miss blushie would say?
no subject
howdelightful
2013-05-03 01:28 am (UTC)
(
link
)
tut up is indeed correct.
no subject
keevan
2013-05-03 01:35 am (UTC)
(
link
)
ah... weyoun. i defer to your... expertise.
no subject
waltersullivan
2013-05-03 01:22 am (UTC)
(
link
)
well i can see why.
1952 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-03 01:22 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject